Search found 551 matches

by admin
Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:34 pm
Forum: Using LogMX
Topic: memory usage
Replies: 1
Views: 6117

Hello, To increase memory, you can use the -Xmx option in start script, please see http://www.logmx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42. You can also just read the end of the file using the Tail function: File>Open> tab "Tail" at the bottom Feel free to let me know if you have any other question/problem. X...
by admin
Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:51 pm
Forum: Writing a Parser
Topic: Custom Parser
Replies: 5
Views: 26992

Hello, Here is a fixed version: //e.g. [Thu Oct 22 19:00:42 2009] private static final DateFormat APACHE_TIMESTAMP = new SimpleDateFormat( "EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss yyyy", Locale.US); //[Sat Oct 31 00:33:07 2009] [error] [client 192.168.20.100] client denied by server private static final Pattern ERROR =...
by admin
Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:02 pm
Forum: Writing a Parser
Topic: Custom Parser
Replies: 5
Views: 26992

Hello, You're right, your last post shows the good Pattern to use. I don't think you have to write a Java Class Parser for this simple log format. The only thing is that since this format doesn't include any "Emitter" (%c) information (like class, package, process, ...), all your log entries will be...
by admin
Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:43 pm
Forum: Submitting a feature request
Topic: Create installation document
Replies: 1
Views: 7826

Hello, The next version (v2.0.0) will come with a "Readme.txt" file in the LogMX root directory, which will contain (among other sections) an "Installation" section. OK for the license file, you're right, we will add the following indication in the License file: To activate your LogMX Professional v...
by admin
Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:27 pm
Forum: Writing a Parser
Topic: Public parser repository
Replies: 11
Views: 46647

Thank you very much, well done :D May I suggest an optimization: using reluctant quantifier ".*?" instead of greedy quantifier ".*" will greatly improve regular expression processing. I think it can be used here without problem (reluctant performs a "minimal matching" compared to greedy that will tr...
by admin
Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:08 pm
Forum: Writing a Parser
Topic: Public parser repository
Replies: 11
Views: 46647

For the public parser repository, we are currently collecting some common log parsers, and we will open such a repository on our website soon :wink:
by admin
Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:05 pm
Forum: Writing a Parser
Topic: Public parser repository
Replies: 11
Views: 46647

Hello, There's no Eclipse log file parser at this time, but you can try this Log4jPattern Parser: !ENTRY %c %x %X %d{yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS}%n!MESSAGE %m (tested with Eclipse 3.4.1, workspace log file ".metadata/.log") It handles emitter (i.e. plug-in), message, date, but not the log level, which s...
by admin
Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:49 pm
Forum: Using LogMX
Topic: Can't setup log4j parser for plain text logs
Replies: 2
Views: 5210

Hello, The pattern you gave to LogMX should not contain "org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout=", so you just have to replace: org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout="%d{HH:mm:ss,SSS}: %-5p [%t:%c] %m%n with %d{HH:mm:ss,SSS}: %-5p [%t:%c] %m%n and it should works! (I've tested this pattern with LogMX v1.3.3 and it...
by admin
Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:18 pm
Forum: Using LogMX
Topic: !!! FIXED: Very slow scrolling on log entries table !!!
Replies: 1
Views: 31079

!!! FIXED: Very slow scrolling on log entries table !!!

If you use: - Windows XP/Vista/7, and - Java 1.6.0_u10 or greater (1.6.0_u16 so far), you may experience very poor performances when scrolling main log entries table (for all LogMX versions). This is due to a known Java bug appeared in 1.6.0_u10 dealing with Direct3D and XOR paint mode. To fix the p...
by admin
Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:12 pm
Forum: Using LogMX
Topic: Problem using Log4j tag settings
Replies: 2
Views: 18124

Hello,

You're right, it's a bug appeared in v1.3.3 (a regression due to Locale infos added to parsers in v1.3.3).
Sorry for that, it will be fixed in v2.0.0.

Xavier
by admin
Sun Aug 02, 2009 4:56 pm
Forum: Using LogMX
Topic: Trouble with filters
Replies: 2
Views: 17800

Hello,

You're right, it's a bug. Sorry for the inconvenience.

This error occurs when using at least 3 "OR" filters ("AND" filters don't produce this error). It will be fixed in v2.0.0.

Xavier.
by admin
Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:33 pm
Forum: Submitting a feature request
Topic: Feature Request: Upgrade process improvements
Replies: 3
Views: 26131

Hello, As explained in the post you linked, you can safely replace the new config file with your old one, we always make sure that each LogMX version handles older config files (backward compatibility). You are right, if you can't write in the files located in the LogMX directory (start script + con...
by admin
Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:04 pm
Forum: Submitting a feature request
Topic: Feature Request: Bookmark log files
Replies: 3
Views: 31376

You're welcome! :wink:
Thanks for your ideas
by admin
Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:58 pm
Forum: Submitting a feature request
Topic: Feature Request: Bookmark log files
Replies: 3
Views: 31376

Hello, Indeed, we plan to add "Workspace" and "Alias" (or "Bookmark") concepts in LogMX, since your previous feature request : http://www.logmx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32. Workspaces and aliases will be stored in a tree structure where you can hold a set of aliases (i.e. file URLs) in each Workspa...
by admin
Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:37 am
Forum: Miscellaneous
Topic: Support for "Trace"-Level
Replies: 3
Views: 34771

Hello, You're right, thanks for pointing me this out! It will be added in the next release (v2.0.0 that should be available this fall). In the meantime, you can add/edit/remove any Log Level in LogMX: simply go to menu "Tools" > "Options", tab "Levels". You can then add a 'TRACE' level with the colo...