Search found 551 matches
- Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:34 pm
- Forum: Using LogMX
- Topic: memory usage
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6118
Hello, To increase memory, you can use the -Xmx option in start script, please see http://www.logmx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42. You can also just read the end of the file using the Tail function: File>Open> tab "Tail" at the bottom Feel free to let me know if you have any other question/problem. X...
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:51 pm
- Forum: Writing a Parser
- Topic: Custom Parser
- Replies: 5
- Views: 27099
Hello, Here is a fixed version: //e.g. [Thu Oct 22 19:00:42 2009] private static final DateFormat APACHE_TIMESTAMP = new SimpleDateFormat( "EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss yyyy", Locale.US); //[Sat Oct 31 00:33:07 2009] [error] [client 192.168.20.100] client denied by server private static final Pattern ERROR =...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:02 pm
- Forum: Writing a Parser
- Topic: Custom Parser
- Replies: 5
- Views: 27099
Hello, You're right, your last post shows the good Pattern to use. I don't think you have to write a Java Class Parser for this simple log format. The only thing is that since this format doesn't include any "Emitter" (%c) information (like class, package, process, ...), all your log entries will be...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:43 pm
- Forum: Submitting a feature request
- Topic: Create installation document
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7830
Hello, The next version (v2.0.0) will come with a "Readme.txt" file in the LogMX root directory, which will contain (among other sections) an "Installation" section. OK for the license file, you're right, we will add the following indication in the License file: To activate your LogMX Professional v...
- Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:27 pm
- Forum: Writing a Parser
- Topic: Public parser repository
- Replies: 11
- Views: 46771
Thank you very much, well done :D May I suggest an optimization: using reluctant quantifier ".*?" instead of greedy quantifier ".*" will greatly improve regular expression processing. I think it can be used here without problem (reluctant performs a "minimal matching" compared to greedy that will tr...
- Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:08 pm
- Forum: Writing a Parser
- Topic: Public parser repository
- Replies: 11
- Views: 46771
- Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:05 pm
- Forum: Writing a Parser
- Topic: Public parser repository
- Replies: 11
- Views: 46771
Hello, There's no Eclipse log file parser at this time, but you can try this Log4jPattern Parser: !ENTRY %c %x %X %d{yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS}%n!MESSAGE %m (tested with Eclipse 3.4.1, workspace log file ".metadata/.log") It handles emitter (i.e. plug-in), message, date, but not the log level, which s...
- Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:49 pm
- Forum: Using LogMX
- Topic: Can't setup log4j parser for plain text logs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5210
Hello, The pattern you gave to LogMX should not contain "org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout=", so you just have to replace: org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout="%d{HH:mm:ss,SSS}: %-5p [%t:%c] %m%n with %d{HH:mm:ss,SSS}: %-5p [%t:%c] %m%n and it should works! (I've tested this pattern with LogMX v1.3.3 and it...
- Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:18 pm
- Forum: Using LogMX
- Topic: !!! FIXED: Very slow scrolling on log entries table !!!
- Replies: 1
- Views: 31182
!!! FIXED: Very slow scrolling on log entries table !!!
If you use: - Windows XP/Vista/7, and - Java 1.6.0_u10 or greater (1.6.0_u16 so far), you may experience very poor performances when scrolling main log entries table (for all LogMX versions). This is due to a known Java bug appeared in 1.6.0_u10 dealing with Direct3D and XOR paint mode. To fix the p...
- Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:12 pm
- Forum: Using LogMX
- Topic: Problem using Log4j tag settings
- Replies: 2
- Views: 18125
- Sun Aug 02, 2009 4:56 pm
- Forum: Using LogMX
- Topic: Trouble with filters
- Replies: 2
- Views: 17801
- Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:33 pm
- Forum: Submitting a feature request
- Topic: Feature Request: Upgrade process improvements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 26146
Hello, As explained in the post you linked, you can safely replace the new config file with your old one, we always make sure that each LogMX version handles older config files (backward compatibility). You are right, if you can't write in the files located in the LogMX directory (start script + con...
- Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:04 pm
- Forum: Submitting a feature request
- Topic: Feature Request: Bookmark log files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 31385
- Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:58 pm
- Forum: Submitting a feature request
- Topic: Feature Request: Bookmark log files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 31385
Hello, Indeed, we plan to add "Workspace" and "Alias" (or "Bookmark") concepts in LogMX, since your previous feature request : http://www.logmx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32. Workspaces and aliases will be stored in a tree structure where you can hold a set of aliases (i.e. file URLs) in each Workspa...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:37 am
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Support for "Trace"-Level
- Replies: 3
- Views: 34875
Hello, You're right, thanks for pointing me this out! It will be added in the next release (v2.0.0 that should be available this fall). In the meantime, you can add/edit/remove any Log Level in LogMX: simply go to menu "Tools" > "Options", tab "Levels". You can then add a 'TRACE' level with the colo...